Skip to content
The Office is Open: Call Us: 416-366-3335 | 27 Queen St E, #1011, Toronto

Cart

Your cart is empty

Egyptian Revival Jewellery

Egyptian Revival Jewellery

Three centuries of pharaonic fascination in gold, enamel, and coloured stone

Jewellery periods & stylesView in dictionary · 2,050 words

Egyptian Revival is the collective term for successive waves of jewellery and decorative-arts production in which Western makers drew upon the visual vocabulary of ancient Egypt — scarabs, lotus blossoms, hieroglyphs, sphinxes, falcons, the ankh, the djed pillar, and the cartouche — to produce pieces that were simultaneously archaeological in inspiration and entirely contemporary in manufacture. The style is not a single coherent movement but rather a recurring phenomenon, each episode triggered by a specific historical event that brought Egypt dramatically to European and American attention. Three principal revivals are recognised: the Napoleonic wave of roughly 1798–1820, the Victorian-era resurgence of the 1860s–1880s, and the most celebrated and commercially consequential episode, the Art Deco Egyptomania that erupted after Howard Carter's opening of Tutankhamun's tomb in November 1922. Across all three periods, the material palette remained remarkably consistent — lapis lazuli, turquoise, carnelian, faience, and gold — because makers were consciously echoing the actual materials of pharaonic jewellery, many examples of which had entered European museum collections and were available for direct study.

The Napoleonic Wave, 1798–1820

The first modern Egyptian Revival in jewellery can be dated with unusual precision to Napoleon Bonaparte's Egyptian campaign of 1798–1801. The expedition was accompanied by a team of savants — scientists, artists, and engineers — whose meticulous observations were eventually published in the monumental Description de l'Égypte (1809–1829), a work that placed accurate renderings of Egyptian monuments, hieroglyphs, and artefacts before a European audience for the first time at encyclopaedic scale. The visual impact was immediate. Parisian goldsmiths and jewellers, already attuned to the Neoclassical taste of the Empire period, found in Egyptian imagery a suitably grand and exotic complement to Greco-Roman forms.

Empire-period Egyptian Revival jewellery is characterised by relatively restrained interpretation: sphinx heads used as terminals on bracelets and parures, lotus-column motifs on earrings, and hieroglyphic friezes rendered in gold or cut steel. The gemstones employed were often those already fashionable in Neoclassical jewellery — coral, hardstone cameos, and paste — rather than a deliberate attempt to replicate ancient Egyptian materials. Cameos carved with Egyptian subjects, particularly profiles of Isis or Cleopatra, were especially popular and were produced in quantity in Rome and Naples for the Grand Tour market. The style spread rapidly to Britain, where Regency goldsmiths adapted it with characteristic restraint, and to the German states, where it merged with the emerging Biedermeier taste for archaeological exactitude.

The Napoleonic revival subsided as the Empire itself collapsed, but it established a template — the use of Egyptian motifs as a signifier of learning, exoticism, and historical depth — that subsequent revivals would inherit.

The Victorian Archaeological Revival, c. 1860–1890

A second, more archaeologically rigorous wave gathered momentum in the 1860s, driven by several converging forces: the opening of the Suez Canal (1869), which renewed European interest in Egypt as a living and accessible place; the growing influence of the archaeological jewellery movement pioneered by the Roman goldsmith Fortunato Pio Castellani and later by his sons; and the increasing availability of genuine ancient Egyptian artefacts — particularly scarabs — in the European antiquities market following decades of excavation and collecting.

The Victorian Egyptian Revival is distinguished from its Napoleonic predecessor by a far closer fidelity to ancient sources. Makers such as Carlo Giuliano in London, working in the spirit of Castellani, produced pieces in which ancient scarabs — often genuine New Kingdom or Late Period examples in glazed steatite or faience — were mounted in gold settings alongside granulation work and enamel that deliberately recalled ancient technique. The Castellani firm itself produced documented examples in which ancient Egyptian elements were incorporated directly into contemporary mounts, a practice that blurs the boundary between antiquity and revival in ways that continue to challenge auction-house cataloguers.

Turquoise, lapis lazuli, and carnelian — the three chromatic pillars of ancient Egyptian jewellery — were now employed with conscious archaeological intent. Enamel in the same three colours (blue, deep blue-black, and red-orange) was used where the stones themselves were unavailable or impractical. The lotus flower, the scarab beetle (Scarabaeus sacer), and the winged disc of Horus became standard motifs, appearing on brooches, bracelets, necklaces, and earrings across the full range of the market, from bespoke pieces by leading London and Paris houses to mass-produced gilt-metal examples sold through department stores.

Important institutional collections formed during this period — notably at the British Museum, the Louvre, and the newly reorganised Egyptian collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York — made ancient Egyptian jewellery accessible to designers and the educated public alike, further deepening the iconographic literacy of both makers and buyers.

Tutankhamun and the Art Deco Explosion, 1922–c. 1935

No single event in the history of gemmology and jewellery design has had a more immediate or more thoroughly documented commercial impact than Howard Carter's discovery of the intact tomb of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings on 4 November 1922, and the subsequent opening of the burial chamber in February 1923. The global press coverage was unprecedented; photographs of the gold funerary mask, the gilded shrine, and the extraordinary jewellery — pectorals inlaid with lapis lazuli, turquoise, and carnelian; scarab bracelets in gold and faience; collars of polychrome faience beads — reached every major city within days. The timing was fortuitous in the extreme: Art Deco, already in full development in Paris, was a style supremely receptive to bold geometric forms, strong colour contrasts, and the integration of coloured stones as structural rather than merely decorative elements. Egyptian imagery mapped onto Art Deco aesthetics with an almost uncanny precision.

The response from the leading Paris maisons was swift and sustained. Cartier, whose creative director Jeanne Toussaint and designer Charles Jacqueau had already been studying Egyptian sources in the Bibliothèque nationale and the Louvre, produced a series of pieces in the early 1920s that are now regarded as canonical examples of the style: vanity cases with hieroglyphic enamel panels, brooches in the form of winged scarabs set with carved lapis lazuli and calibré-cut rubies and emeralds, and bracelets combining onyx, coral, and turquoise in geometric cartouche forms. Van Cleef & Arpels, Boucheron, and Mauboussin produced comparable work, as did leading American houses including Tiffany & Co. and Black, Starr & Frost.

The gemstone choices of this third revival were inflected by Art Deco's broader chromatic preferences. While lapis lazuli, turquoise, and carnelian remained central — their presence now validated by the actual contents of Tutankhamun's treasure — they were joined by materials that had no ancient Egyptian precedent but that served the period's love of high contrast: onyx, coral, rock crystal, and calibré-cut rubies and emeralds. Faience, the quintessential ancient Egyptian material (a quartz-based ceramic with a vitreous glaze), was rarely used by high jewellery houses, but its colour range — turquoise, cobalt blue, green, and white — was precisely replicated in enamel, which became the dominant surface treatment for Egyptian Revival pieces of the 1920s.

The scarab motif deserves particular attention as the single most persistent and commercially significant element of Egyptian Revival jewellery across all three periods. In ancient Egypt, the scarab beetle was a symbol of the sun god Khepri and of regeneration; carved scarabs served as amulets, seals, and funerary objects. In Victorian revival jewellery, genuine ancient scarabs were routinely mounted as centrepieces. In the Art Deco period, scarabs were more commonly carved from hardstones — lapis lazuli, turquoise, carnelian, green chalcedony, and occasionally chrysoprase — or moulded in faience and mounted in gold or platinum settings. Cartier's carved hardstone scarabs, often flanked by diamond-set wings, represent some of the most technically accomplished examples of the form.

Materials and Gemstones

The material palette of Egyptian Revival jewellery is among the most consistent in the history of Western jewellery, precisely because it was consciously derived from ancient sources that were increasingly well documented and publicly accessible.

  • Lapis lazuli: Used in ancient Egypt primarily from sources in the Badakhshan region of present-day Afghanistan, lapis lazuli appears in Egyptian Revival jewellery as carved scarabs, inlaid panels, and cabochons. Its deep blue, often flecked with pyrite, was understood as the colour of the night sky and of the gods.
  • Turquoise: Ancient Egypt's own turquoise, mined in the Sinai Peninsula at sites including Serabit el-Khadim, was a material of profound symbolic importance. In revival jewellery, turquoise appears both as genuine stone and as enamel approximation, used for scarabs, lotus petals, and geometric inlay.
  • Carnelian: The warm red-orange of carnelian, a variety of chalcedony, was associated in ancient Egypt with the blood of Isis and with protective power. It appears in revival jewellery as carved scarabs, beads, and calibré-cut inlay.
  • Gold: The dominant metal of ancient Egyptian jewellery, gold retained its primacy in all three revival periods. High-karat yellow gold, often with a deliberately warm tone, was preferred over the white metals (silver, platinum) that dominated other Art Deco contexts, precisely because it read as archaeologically authentic.
  • Faience and enamel: Faience — a sintered-quartz body with a vitreous alkaline glaze — was the most widely used decorative material in ancient Egypt but was technically challenging for Western jewellers to replicate convincingly. Polychrome enamel, particularly champlevé and plique-à-jour, served as the standard substitute, capable of reproducing the turquoise, cobalt, and white of faience with great fidelity.
  • Onyx and coral: Both materials entered the Egyptian Revival palette primarily through Art Deco sensibility rather than ancient precedent, but their strong chromatic contrast — black and red-orange — complemented the turquoise and lapis lazuli of the core palette effectively.

Major Makers and Houses

The Egyptian Revival attracted virtually every significant jewellery house of its respective era. In the Napoleonic period, the Parisian firms of Nitot et Fils (later Chaumet) and Foncier produced documented Empire-style Egyptian pieces. In the Victorian period, Castellani, Carlo Giuliano, and Robert Phillips in London were the most archaeologically serious practitioners, while Mellerio dits Meller in Paris produced important examples. In the Art Deco period, the roster of significant makers is extensive: Cartier (Paris, London, New York) produced the largest and most thoroughly documented body of Egyptian Revival work; Van Cleef & Arpels, Boucheron, Mauboussin, and Lacloche Frères in Paris; Tiffany & Co., Marcus & Co., and Black, Starr & Frost in New York; and Garrard in London. Among independent designers, the Egyptian Revival attracted the interest of Suzanne Belperron, whose carved hardstone work of the late 1920s and 1930s, while not exclusively Egyptian in inspiration, drew on the same vocabulary of bold carved forms and strong colour.

Collecting and the Market

Egyptian Revival jewellery occupies a well-established position in the international auction market. Pieces attributable to Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, or Giuliano command significant premiums, and the presence of genuine ancient elements — a mounted New Kingdom scarab, for instance — adds both historical interest and, in some cases, legal complexity, as the international trade in genuine ancient Egyptian artefacts is subject to increasingly stringent provenance requirements under the 1970 UNESCO Convention and subsequent national legislation.

The distinction between genuine ancient Egyptian jewellery, revival pieces incorporating ancient elements, and purely contemporary revival work is a matter of ongoing scholarly and commercial attention. Major auction houses including Christie's, Sotheby's, and Bonhams maintain specialist expertise in this area, and gemmological laboratories are occasionally asked to assess whether carved scarabs or faience elements in mounted pieces are genuinely ancient or modern reproductions. The Victoria and Albert Museum in London, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, and the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston hold important institutional collections that serve as reference points for both scholars and the trade.

Within the broader Art Deco market, Egyptian Revival pieces tend to attract buyers who collect at the intersection of jewellery history and Egyptology — a relatively specialised but consistently active constituency. The centenary of the Tutankhamun discovery in 2022 generated renewed scholarly and popular attention, with several major museum exhibitions and accompanying publications that have refreshed market interest in the style.

Legacy and Influence

The Egyptian Revival's most enduring contribution to jewellery history may be its demonstration that ancient iconography can be absorbed into contemporary design without mere pastiche, provided the maker engages seriously with the source material. The best Art Deco Egyptian Revival pieces — a Cartier winged scarab brooch, a Giuliano pendant with an ancient scarab in granulated gold — are not archaeological reconstructions but genuine creative syntheses, in which ancient symbolism is reinterpreted through the formal language of a modern period. This quality of serious engagement with historical sources, rather than superficial quotation of them, distinguishes the finest Egyptian Revival work from the vast quantity of Egyptian-themed costume jewellery that the Tutankhamun moment also generated, and that continues to be produced whenever Egypt returns to popular attention.

Further Reading