Skip to content
The Office is Open: Call Us: 416-366-3335 | 27 Queen St E, #1011, Toronto

Cart

Your cart is empty

Munich School Jewellery — The Conceptual Studio Movement from Munich's Academy

Munich School Jewellery — The Conceptual Studio Movement from Munich's Academy

Hermann Jünger and the post-war Munich tradition of intellectual and material critique in studio jewellery

Jewellery periods & stylesView in dictionary · 1,271 words

The Munich School is a conceptual studio-jewellery movement centred on the Akademie der Bildenden Künste München (Academy of Fine Arts Munich) from approximately the 1960s onward, characterised by intellectual rigour, material experimentation, and systematic critique of the conventions of traditional jewellery. The movement was pioneered by Hermann Jünger (1928 to 2005), who held the chair of jewellery at the Akademie from 1972 to 1990 and shaped a generation of students into the leading figures of European studio jewellery. Subsequent figures associated with the Munich tradition include Otto Künzli, Bruno Martinazzi, Manfred Bischoff, and Karl Fritsch, with the broader movement profoundly influencing European and American studio jewellery from the 1970s through the present day. The Munich School is extensively documented in collections at the Schmuckmuseum Pforzheim and in the published catalogues of the major studio jewellery exhibitions at international art galleries and museums.

Hermann Jünger and the institutional context

Hermann Jünger studied at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste München in the 1950s under Franz Rickert and held the chair of jewellery at the Akademie from 1972 until his retirement in 1990. His own work, developed across the late 1950s and 1960s, established the conceptual approach that would define the broader Munich tradition: a willingness to subordinate traditional jewellery values (preciousness of materials, technical refinement of craft, ornamental purpose) to broader artistic and intellectual concerns. Jünger's pieces — typically small abstract compositions in gold and silver, often with painted enamel and delicate construction — function more as wearable sculpture than as conventional adornment.

The Akademie's institutional position as a major European art academy provided the broader cultural framework for the movement. The jewellery class at the Akademie was integrated with the broader fine art programme, with students engaging with painting, sculpture, and other disciplines as part of their education in jewellery. The cross-disciplinary engagement supported the conceptual approach that distinguished Munich School jewellery from the more strictly craft-oriented traditions of other European jewellery education programmes.

The conceptual approach

The Munich School's defining contribution to studio jewellery is its sustained critique of the conventions of traditional adornment. Where the European jewellery tradition had taken for granted the use of precious materials (gold, platinum, gemstones), the value of technical refinement, and the function of jewellery as personal ornament and status display, the Munich School systematically questioned each of these assumptions. The use of non-precious materials — plastic, paper, found objects, base metals — became a recurring strategy. The critical engagement with technical convention sometimes produced pieces of deliberate unfinished or rough character. The function of jewellery was problematised, with some pieces functioning as sculptural objects intended for display rather than wear.

The conceptual approach drew on the broader European art movements of the post-war period — Arte Povera, Fluxus, Conceptual Art — and integrated jewellery into the dialogue of contemporary art rather than maintaining its separate identity as a craft tradition. The integration was not without controversy, with some critics seeing the conceptual approach as a betrayal of the craft tradition and others recognising it as the necessary adaptation of jewellery to the broader cultural conditions of the late twentieth century.

Otto Künzli and the second generation

Otto Künzli (born 1948 in Switzerland, studied with Jünger at the Akademie from 1972 to 1978) represents the second-generation development of the Munich School and is one of the most consequential figures in the broader history of studio jewellery. Künzli's work systematically critiques the social functions of jewellery, with pieces such as Goldwurst (1977, gold sausage in plastic packaging satirising the commodification of gold), Beauty Gallery (1985, photographs of pieces worn by anonymous women as a meditation on the social context of jewellery), and the Wallpaper Brooches (1983, brooches made by gluing wallpaper offcuts to brooch backs to question the aesthetic conventions of ornament).

Künzli's tenure as professor at the Akademie from 1991 to 2014, succeeding Jünger, extended the Munich School tradition into a third generation of students and consolidated the international reputation of the movement. Künzli's published writings on the conceptual basis of contemporary jewellery have become standard references in the field, and his work has been the subject of major retrospective exhibitions at international art museums.

Bruno Martinazzi and the broader European context

Bruno Martinazzi (1923 to 2018) was an Italian sculptor and jeweller whose work paralleled and influenced the Munich tradition. Martinazzi's pieces — typically figurative or partially figurative gold sculptures in the form of jewellery — engage with Renaissance and classical Italian sculpture and provide a Mediterranean counterpoint to the more austere German conceptualism of the Munich tradition. The connections between Martinazzi and the Munich School illustrate the broader European character of the post-war studio jewellery movement, with similar conceptual approaches developing across multiple national traditions.

Materials and techniques

Munich School jewellery employs an extraordinarily wide range of materials and techniques. Traditional precious metals (gold, silver, platinum) appear alongside base metals (steel, copper, aluminium), plastic and synthetic materials (acrylic, polyester, found plastic objects), organic materials (wood, bone, horn), and various found and reclaimed materials. The technical approach is similarly diverse, with some pieces showing exquisite traditional craftsmanship and others deliberately rough or unfinished construction. The variety of materials and techniques reflects the conceptual freedom of the movement, with each piece selecting the materials and methods appropriate to its specific intent rather than working within a defined craft framework.

The Schmuckmuseum Pforzheim and institutional documentation

The Schmuckmuseum Pforzheim — the German jewellery museum located in Pforzheim, the historic centre of the German jewellery industry — holds the principal institutional collection of Munich School and broader European studio jewellery. The museum's collections and exhibition programme have been instrumental in establishing the institutional recognition of studio jewellery as a major contemporary art form, with regular exhibitions of Munich School artists supporting both the scholarly study of the movement and the broader public engagement with contemporary jewellery.

Other significant institutional holdings include the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam (which holds important collections of Dutch and broader European studio jewellery), the Royal College of Art (which has been a parallel centre of studio jewellery education in the United Kingdom), and various US institutions including the Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Museum and the Museum of Arts and Design in New York.

Influence and the contemporary context

The influence of the Munich School on contemporary studio jewellery has been substantial. The conceptual approach pioneered by Jünger and elaborated by Künzli and his contemporaries has become broadly accepted in the international studio jewellery community, with major schools across Europe, North America, and East Asia following methodologically related approaches. The market for studio jewellery, while remaining specialised, has developed substantially over the past several decades, with major art galleries representing studio jewellers and significant prices commanded for important pieces by the leading figures.

In the trade

For Skyjems and the broader trade, the Munich School and the broader studio jewellery movement represent a parallel category to the conventional fine jewellery trade. The pieces are typically handled by specialist art galleries and through the auction houses' contemporary art and design sales rather than the conventional jewellery channels. Important Munich School pieces by the leading figures command substantial prices and are recognised as significant contemporary art works. Understanding the Munich tradition is useful context for engagement with the broader contemporary jewellery scene and for appreciating the conceptual range of the medium beyond the conventional fine jewellery context.

Further reading